New questionnaire contains step 3 parts. Area I provided issues out of socio-market research (age, level of training, parity, familial money, occupation, current relationship position, sexual interest, reputation for HPV vaccination, and you will history of unusual cervical cancer tumors screening).
Region II composed of six questions about the goal women who will likely be processed, years to begin with, regularity, many years otherwise standards to eliminate regarding evaluating, and methods from screening. Just the users that has have you ever heard of HPV do proceed to Area III and that analyzed knowledge about HPV out of its sorts of (oncogenic or non-oncogenic), function away from indication and you can avoidance.
Prior to the studies, the fresh survey of area II and you may area III in Thai variation was basically considered, talked about, and you can changed up until opinion certainly 20 boffins who had been every gynecologic oncologists (certain have been people in other synchronous education). The pros ranked each one of 19 concerns since either ‘relevant’ or ‘not relevant’. The thing-peak Blogs Authenticity List (I-CVI) try calculated for each and every item, and Content Legitimacy List (CVI) is calculated if you take the common proportion away from fourteen questions regarding understanding of cervical cancer tumors tests and you may 5 questions relating to HPV. The CVI were step 1 for parts of the fresh survey (S1 Dining table). The new precision is checked inside 29 feminine with similar attribute as the members. The latest Cronbach’ alpha coefficients into precision were 0.819 having information about cervical cancer tumors assessment and you may 0.907 to possess understanding of HPV.
Research range
On time out of planned colposcopy, the analysis secretary given information of research towards female whom fulfilled introduction criteria. The women whom accessible to take part gave created told concur and responded the newest questionnaire independently themselves ahead of proceeding so you can colposcopy.
Investigation obtained for this study were socio-demographic studies (Part We of the survey), knowledge of cervical cancer tests (Part II), and expertise in HPV (Area III).
Statistical analysis
The newest solutions of real information regarding cervical cancers assessment and you will HPV had been reviewed from the each item before scoring categorization. Right address is actually obtained given that step 1 whereas ‘incorrect and you can unsure answer’ try scored 0.
Regarding 14 inquiries off cervical malignant tumors screening, feminine whoever get was ? 10 had been randomly categorized given that with ‘an effective knowledge’ or else was basically considered as with “not-good training”. To own expertise in HPV, women whoever answer is actually ‘never ever observed HPV’ was in fact excluded in the data from HPV education.
Out of 5 questions, feminine whose rating have been ? 3 was in fact considered as which have ‘a great experience with HPV’ usually since ‘unhealthy knowledge’. Out of 19 concerns, feminine whoever get was ? thirteen have been classified because the which have ‘a beneficial full knowledge’ otherwise as the ‘not-good full knowledge’.
All study was in fact accumulated within the a digital databases and you will reviewed using SPSS V.26.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Detailed statistics were utilized to research demographic studies and you may was in fact described because wide variety that have percentage, mean having basic deviation or average that have range. The fresh new connection anywhere between for every single changeable and training rating have been examined having fun with simple linear regression. Exploratory design was developed within the multivariable studies plus all variables possibly associated with the content score. The latest believed number of analytical importance was an effective p-worth of 0.05 or reduced.
Show
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean se stedet age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>
